Monday, January 8, 2018

Pro-life centers to Supreme Court: Don’t allow govt to force us to advertise for abortion

Source: Alliance Defending Freedom



Washington, D.C. - January 8, 2017 - (The Ponder News) -- Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys filed their opening brief Monday with the U.S. Supreme Court in a lawsuit challenging a California law that forces pro-life pregnancy care centers to provide free advertising for the abortion industry. ADF represents a pro-life pregnancy care center network, National Institute of Family and Life Advocates, and two independent centers in the case, which in November the high court agreed to take up.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld a federal district judge’s decision to allow the law to remain in effect while the lawsuit, National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, proceeds. The brief asks the Supreme Court to reverse the ruling, halt the law, and affirm that forcing the centers to provide the free advertising contrary to their core mission is a violation of their constitutionally protected freedoms.

“No one should be forced to provide free advertising for the abortion industry. This is particularly true when the ones who are being forced to provide it are pro-life pregnancy care centers,” said ADF President, CEO, and General Counsel Michael Farris, who will argue the case before the high court. “Compelled speech strikes at the very heart of constitutionally protected liberties, which are most at risk when speakers are targeted by government officials who disagree with their thoughts and ideas. Targeting people who disagree with the government is exactly what the California law does.”

California’s Reproductive FACT Act, AB 775, requires licensed medical centers that offer free, pro-life help to pregnant women to post a disclosure saying that California provides free or low-cost abortion and contraception services. The disclosure must also include a phone number for a county office that refers women to Planned Parenthood and others in the abortion industry. The law also forces unlicensed pregnancy centers to add large disclosures in multiple languages about their non-medical status in all advertisements, which obscure and crowd out their pro-life speech. Other courts have invalidated or mostly invalidated similar laws in Austin, Texas; Montgomery County, Maryland; Baltimore; and New York City.

According to the opening brief filed with the Supreme Court, “This Court has long held that compelled speech is highly disfavored because it imperils freedom by giving government control of the voices of private actors—and that laws targeting particular speakers because of their views are especially dangerous. The government ‘may not substitute its judgment as to how best to speak for that of speakers and listeners; free and robust debate cannot thrive if directed by the government….’ This Court should continue its steadfast defense of this fundamental freedom against governmental attempts to compel speech, and reverse the judgment of the Ninth Circuit.”

“These non-profit pregnancy centers exist to encourage expectant mothers to give their children the opportunity for life,” said ADF Senior Counsel and Senior Vice President of the U.S. Legal Division Kristen Waggoner. “The last thing the centers should be forced to do is point these women to the abortion industry.”

“National Institute of Family and Life Advocates member centers exist to empower a mother’s choice of life. They do this by providing assistance and resources free of charge—often in the form of pre-natal vitamins, baby clothes, and ultrasounds,” added NIFLA President and Founder Thomas Glessner, J.D. “All of their speech is designed to further this goal. California’s law purposely hampers this right from the beginning of a pregnancy center’s interaction with expectant mothers.”

“The legislative record demonstrates that the State chose to mandate these compelled messages precisely because of the pregnancy centers’ pro-life views,” the opening brief explains. “The legislative committee report described the centers’ messages as ‘unfortunate’ because they ‘aim to discourage and prevent women from seeking abortions….’ The Legislature created exceptions within the Act, seeking to ensure it applies only to centers that express this disfavored view. Such government targeting of viewpoints runs afoul of this Court’s cases ‘establish[ing] that the State cannot advance some points of view by burdening the expression of others.’”

ADF-allied attorney John Eastman of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence at Chapman University’s Fowler School of Law, Anne O’Connor of NIFLA, and Dean R. Broyles of The National Center for Law and Policy are co-counsel in the lawsuit on behalf of NIFLA and the two pregnancy centers.


Alliance Defending Freedom is an alliance-building, non-profit legal organization that advocates for the right of people to freely live out their faith.


See more headlines at The Ponder News Web Site

GOVERNOR WALKER ISSUES STATEMENT ON DEPT. OF INTERIOR’S FIVE-YEAR OFFSHORE LEASING PLAN

Source: Alaska Governor’s Office



Anchorage, AK - January 8, 2017 - (The Ponder News) -- Governor Bill Walker issued the following statement after the U.S. Department of Interior released its new draft Five-Year Oil and Gas Offshore Leasing Program for the Outer Continental Shelf. The proposal includes 19 lease sales in Alaska.

“The Department of Interior’s draft five-year offshore leasing plan is an important step toward allowing Alaskans to responsibly develop our natural resources as we see fit. My administration is committed to responsible resource development, and has established a pattern of working successfully with our Congressional Delegation and federal agencies to unleash Alaska’s energy potential. I thank Secretary Zinke for his Department’s work on this plan, and invite him to cooperatively engage with Alaskans as the plan’s development process continues. We look forward to continued dialogue to ensure that any offshore development takes into account environmental and safety concerns, and robust input from community residents who live, work, and subsist in the lease sale areas included in this proposed plan.” –Governor Bill Walker

The Department’s proposed plan for Outer Continental Shelf leasing for 2019-2024 is available here .


See more headlines at The Ponder News Web Site

Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Salvadorans Ended by DHS

Source: Federation for American Immigration Reform
and Department of Homeland Security




Washington, D.C. - January 8, 2017 - (The Ponder News) -- The Secretary of Homeland Security announced her determination that termination of the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designation for El Salvador was required pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act. To allow for an orderly transition, she has determined to delay the termination for 18 months. The designation will terminate on Sept. 9, 2019.

The decision to terminate TPS for El Salvador was made after a review of the disaster-related conditions upon which the country’s original designation was based and an assessment of whether those originating conditions continue to exist as required by statute. Based on careful consideration of available information, including recommendations received as part of an inter-agency consultation process, the Secretary determined that the original conditions caused by the 2001 earthquakes no longer exist. Thus, under the applicable statute, the current TPS designation must be terminated.

The Department of Homeland Security has conducted extensive outreach to Salvadoran communities throughout the country. This includes, but is not limited to, community forums on TPS, panel discussions with Salvadoran community organizers, stakeholder teleconferences, regular meetings with TPS beneficiaries, news releases to the Salvadoran community, meetings with Salvadoran government officials, meetings at local churches, and listening sessions. The Secretary met recently with the El Salvadorian Foreign Minister and Ambassador to the United States, and spoke with President Sánchez Cerén.

Following the 2001 earthquake, El Salvador received a significant amount of international aid to assist in its recovery efforts, including millions of dollars dedicated to emergency and long-term assistance. Many reconstruction projects have now been completed. Schools and hospitals damaged by the earthquakes have been reconstructed and repaired, homes have been rebuilt, and money has been provided for water and sanitation and to repair earthquake damaged roads and other infrastructure. The substantial disruption of living conditions caused by the earthquake no longer exist.

Additionally, in recent years, the U.S. government has been repatriating individuals back to El Salvador - more than 39,000 in the last two years - demonstrating that the temporary inability of El Salvador to adequately return their nationals after the earthquake has been addressed.

To allow for an orderly transition, the effective date of the termination of TPS for El Salvador will be delayed 18 months to provide time for individuals with TPS to arrange for their departure or to seek an alternative lawful immigration status in the United States, if eligible. Salvadorans in the United States who benefited from TPS may still receive other protections under our immigration system for which they are eligible.

The 18 months will also provide time for El Salvador to prepare for the return and reintegration of its citizens. During this timeframe, DHS will work with the Department of State and the Government of El Salvador to help educate relevant stakeholders and facilitate an orderly transition. In addition to materials posted online, DHS components will participate in outreach activities such as teleconferences, town halls and roundtables to ensure that affected populations have a full and accurate understanding of their rights and obligations.

Only Congress can legislate a permanent solution addressing the lack of an enduring lawful immigration status of those currently protected by TPS who have lived and worked in the United States for many years. The 18-month delayed termination will allow Congress time to craft a potential legislative solution.

Salvadorans with TPS will be required to re-register for TPS and apply for Employment Authorization Documents in order to legally work in the United States until the termination of El Salvador’s TPS designation becomes effective Sept. 9, 2019. Further details about this termination for TPS, including the re-registration period, will appear in a Federal Register notice. Salvadoran TPS beneficiaries should not submit re-registration applications until the re-registration period is announced through the Federal Register notice.

Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) President Dan Stein in response to the announcement by Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen that the administration is ending Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for citizens of El Salvador, has issued this statement:

"The decision to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Salvadorans, effective September 2019, is long overdue and welcome, sending the strongest signal yet that rampant abuse of the TPS program will no longer be accepted by this administration. However, we do believe that six months' notice is all that would be necessary.

"TPS is a policy tool created by Congress in 1990 that allows the U.S. government to extend temporary protections for those visiting the U.S. whose home countries experience natural disasters while they are here. However, in practice, most of the true beneficiaries of TPS are not temporary visitors, but rather people who entered the United States illegally. This holds true for most of the roughly 260,000 Salvadorans who have enjoyed protections since a series of devastating earthquakes ravaged their country nearly 20 years ago.

"If those who benefit from TPS status never return home due to a pattern of unjustified extensions, then future administrations will be unwilling and unable to justify extending this temporary public policy safety net to those who find themselves in a similar situation in the future. Secretary Nielsen and the administration should be applauded for recognizing the temporary nature of this policy tool and for their willingness to stand up for the original intent of the law as passed by Congress.

"Today's announcement underscores the temporary nature of TPS, and reminds us that it was never intended to be used as a tool to sidestep the legal immigration process. 'Temporary' clearly does not mean 'forever.'"

ABOUT FAIR
Founded in 1979, FAIR is the country's largest immigration reform group. With more than 1.3 million members and supporters nationwide, FAIR fights for immigration policies that serve national interests, not special interests. FAIR believes that immigration reform must enhance national security, improve the economy, protect jobs, preserve our environment, and establish a rule of law that is recognized and enforced.

Other Reactions:

Senator Cory A. Booker (D-NJ)

“This decision to end protections for nearly 200,000 Salvadorans – including thousands right here in New Jersey – is heartless and a grave mistake. TPS was created to offer temporary, humane protection to foreign nationals living in the United States when extraordinary conditions make it impossible for them to return home. It is clear that El Salvador is not in a position to receive these families, and rescinding their TPS designation only stands to jeopardize the health and safety of thousands while tearing families apart. The Department of Homeland Security should reverse this decision and extend El Salvador’s TPS while Congress finds a permanent solution.”

Sendator Benjamin L.Cardin - (D - MD)

“Instilling fear in vulnerable children and families should not be the American way, but it seems to be a recurring pattern with the Trump Administration. This latest in a string of ill-advised immigration decisions will have a devastating impact on the American and Salvadoran families currently living in the United States. It isn’t right and it runs counter to the American values that built this great Nation.

“I am concerned about what will happen to these individuals – many mixed nationality families – who have been a part of American communities for so long. For nearly a decade, the country has consistently suffered per capita murder rates that have been among the worst in the world. In 2016, the people of El Salvador were victims of over 5,200 homicides, an alarming rate of more than 80 per 100,000 people and the highest globally. El Salvador has limited capacity to absorb the nearly 200,000 individuals who could be subject to immediate deportation. We welcomed these individuals to America to save them from danger; the Trump Administration cannot inject them back without regard for their safety and current circumstances on the ground in El Salvador.

“We also must take into account the more than 190,000 U.S. born children – American citizens – who have Salvadoran parents that are TPS beneficiaries. Forcing these parents to return to El Salvador would create unnecessary burdens and separate families. In Maryland alone, 19,800 Salvadorans in are TPS holders, and 17,100 U.S.-born children in Maryland have Salvadoran parents who are TPS holders. 18,000 workers in Maryland are Salvadoran TPS holders, and $1.1 billion would be lost from state GDP annually without Salvadoran workers who hold TPS.

“I call on my colleagues to take up our legislation to create a pathway to legal residency for hundreds of thousands of TPS recipients who call America their home. Let's do it now. Such a bill is truly in line with America’s values. It’s the right thing to do.”

Senator Tammy Ducksworth (D - IL)

“The Trump administration’s announcement that they will tear families apart and no longer allow America to be a refuge for hundreds of thousands whose lives are at risk in El Salvador is not just shortsighted; it’s heartbreaking and it flies in the face of the values that built this great nation.”

Joaquin Castro (D-TX, 20th)

“Revoking the Temporary Protected Status of hundreds of thousands of people who live and work in the United States is the Trump Administration’s latest attack on immigrants that will have negative consequences for our nation. TPS recipients submit to regular background checks, received work authorizations, and have children who are American citizens. These hardworking individuals enrich the United States’ economy, especially in Texas where over 30,000 Salvadorans reside. 

“Previous administrations determined that forcing the return of Salvadorans to their country would  be a threat to their personal safety. The Trump Administration’s failure to extend the TPS designation for these individuals paves the way for the deportation of hundreds of thousands of people and endangers their lives. This decision comes shortly after the administration’s November decision to end protections for hardworking citizens of Haiti and Nicaragua. The President is relentless in pushing his anti-immigrant agenda, to the detriment of all Americans.”

Elijah Cummings (D-MD, 7th)

“The Trump administration has decided to continue its cruel immigration policy with today’s announcement ending TPS for hundreds of thousands of Salvadorans living in the United States.  I have said time and again that ending TPS cruelly and needlessly upends the lives of these individuals and the lives of their children while adding to the profound challenges that El Salvador, and other TPS-designated countries, continue to face.  Today’s decision harms regional stability and does not reflect the reality on the ground in El Salvador.

“TPS recipients have been repeatedly and thoroughly vetted by the United States.  They have become an integral part of our society and many have U.S. citizen children.  The administration has decided it is more important to destroy families rather than protect them by allowing these individuals to remain in the United States.

“Congress must act to protect TPS recipients. I again call upon Speaker Ryan to bring legislation to the floor that will protect these individuals from removal, protect Dreamers, and enact comprehensive immigration reform.”

Carlos Curbelo (R-FL, 26th)

“While hoping and waiting they would be able to return to their native countries for years, Salvadoran, Honduran, Nicaraguan, and Haitian immigrants have become essential parts of the South Florida community by contributing to our local economy and culture. Today’s decision about Salvadoran TPS – and previous decisions about Honduran and Nicaraguan TPS – are disappointing. Many years of short-term extensions have created anxiety and uncertainty, not only for these immigrants and their families, but also for employers and neighbors who have welcomed them to our communities. 

“Congress has a responsibility to our constituents to address the status of both TPS immigrants and the DREAMer population. There are multiple legislative solutions that have already been introduced to address the DREAMer and the TPS populations, including my bipartisan RAC Act and ESPERER Act. TPS recipients and DREAMers are running out of time. It’s time for the Leaders of both parties to start taking this issue seriously so we can give these immigrants and those counting on them the peace of mind to continue giving back to their communities, contributing to our economy and supporting their families.”

Saturday, January 6, 2018

Rep. Roybal-Allard Statement on Border Wall Funding Report

By Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA, 40th)



Washington, D.C. - January 6, 2017 - (The Ponder News) -- Congresswoman Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-40), the ranking Democrat on the House Homeland Security Appropriations Subcommittee, issued the following statement about the Wall Street Journal’s report that the Trump Administration plans to spend $18 billion on a border wall with Mexico.

“I am appalled by this report that President Trump wants to waste $18 billion of taxpayer money on an ill-considered border wall. If the story is accurate, it’s deeply concerning. As the top Democrat on the Homeland Security Appropriations Subcommittee, I am acutely aware of America's security funding priorities. We will not address our security needs by building this wall.

“I urge the administration to join our fight to fund real solutions that keep Americans safe. The wall isn’t a solution, it’s a slogan.”


See more headlines at The Ponder News Web Site

Rep. Peters Strongly Opposes Trump Administration Request for $18 Billion in Funding for Border Wall

by Scott Peters (D-CA, 52nd)



Washington, D.C. - January 6, 2017 - (The Ponder News) -- U.S. Congressman Scott Peters (CA-52) voiced strong opposition to the Trump Administration’s request for $18 billion over the next decade to expand the United States’ southwest border wall. If granted, the funding would expand the existing border barrier by more than 700 miles.

“In a selfish political appeal to his base, and on the heels of tax cuts that will cost the country $150 trillion, Donald Trump wants to waste another $18 billion of taxpayer money on a wall that most Americans oppose and that won’t secure the border as well as other more innovative, less expensive technology,” said Rep. Scott Peters.

“I visited San Diego’s existing border fence with local Border Patrol recently, and they said what we need most is technology to detect underground tunnels used to smuggle drugs and people,” Peters said.

“Let’s focus on the real problems without wasting billions on an edifice this President swore the U.S. wouldn’t pay for,” he added.

San Diego is the busiest border crossing in the world. Peters, along with most San Diegans, views the border as an opportunity, not a threat, since the southern border is an economic engine for San Diego and our country.

“When it comes to border security, we need to prioritize halting drug and human trafficking and national security threats with new and up-to-date tactics,” Peters said, adding money would be better spent modernizing new threat detection technology, additional surveillance towers, camera systems, grounds sensors, helicopters, planes, and ships.

Peters also supports better technology and an increased number of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) personnel to more quickly and thoroughly clear legal cargo through customs while better detecting contraband.

Recently, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill, with Peters’ support, that would authorize funding for technology to help CBP catch people attempting to smuggle illegal drugs, particularly fentanyl, which is the most recent opioid to strike the San Diego community.

Further funding is needed for ports of entry near San Diego. For example, Calexico West is still in need of $248 million.


See more headlines at The Ponder News Web Site

PEARCE INTRODUCES BILL TO PROVIDE ACCOUNTABLITY AFTER THE GOLD KING MINE SPILL

By Steve Pearce (R-NM, 2nd)



Washington, D.C. - January 6, 2017 - (The Ponder News) -- Congressman Steve Pearce introduced H.R. 4735, the Gold King Mine Spill Accountability Act of 2018, to provide compensation to those injured by the Gold King Mine spill and to provide funds for New Mexico’s long-term water quality monitoring program.

“The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was responsible for allowing millions of gallons of contaminated waste water to spill into the Animas and San Juan Rivers in New Mexico. This put the health and livelihoods of farmers, ranchers, tribes, and businesses who depend on the water from these rivers at risk, and no one has been held responsible for the damage caused by the spill.

This bill will ensure that New Mexicans affected by this spill will be rightfully compensated by setting up an office to process and better address the claims related to the spill. It will also mandate the EPA to fund a long-term water monitoring program developed by New Mexico to provide proof to the communities that the water is clean and safe following the spill. Lastly, this bill prohibits rulemaking by the EPA until all claims are processed. This recovery process has gone on way too long, and the people of New Mexico deserve certainty. A good government must be held accountable to its citizens, and this bill takes an important and necessary step forward to ensure those who were wronged are made whole,” stated Rep. Pearce.

In August 2015, the EPA cleanup crew, under instruction from supervision, opened the mine and dumped three million gallons of contaminated wastewater containing heavy metals at the Gold King mine in Colorado. Dangerous contaminants including arsenic and lead fouled rivers in New Mexico, Colorado, and Utah. Shortly after the spill, the EPA attempted to claim that water quality had returned to conditions prior to the event, but a scientific team found evidence that contradicted the EPA’s position.


See more headlines at The Ponder News Web Site

Rep. Payne, Jr., Responds to Trump Administration‘s Claim that No Deal Exists for Funding of the Gateway Project

By Donald Payne, Jr. (D-NJ, 10th)



Newark, NJ - January 6, 2017 - (The Ponder News) -- Rep. Donald M. Payne, Jr., released the following statement after the Trump administration claimed the federal government never agreed to fund 50 percent of the Gateway Project, one of the nation’s most important multi-year, multi-billion-dollar infrastructure projects.

“On December 29th, the Trump administration announced another petulant attack on the tri-state area,” said Rep. Donald M. Payne, Jr. (D-NJ-10). “For years, New Jersey, New York, Amtrak, and the federal government have cooperated to make the Gateway Project a reality. The Gateway Project is a multi-billion-dollar expansion and enhancement of the railroad that connects New Jersey and New York. The plan for Gateway's financing is centered on the principle of federal-state cooperation, but the Trump administration now says that the ‘50/50’ agreement is ‘non-existent.’ Trump has a long history of reneging on business deals, but the Gateway Project is not just another golf course. I am confident officials who led the Department of Transportation just one year ago will set the record straight.

“This is not a partisan issue, and it should not be written off as merely a project of local concern. New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, a Republican, and New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat, have come together in good faith to demonstrate that the states are ready and willing to put up billions of dollars to make Gateway a reality. The assets Gateway will restore and enhance are Amtrak properties: the bridges, the tunnels, the rails, all of it. I will remind the administration that Congress created Amtrak to maintain the nation’s passenger railroad infrastructure and service. The Gateway Project will create thousands of jobs, pump money into the economy, and increase rail capacity along Amtrak's Northeast Corridor.

“I am disheartened by the Trump administration’s attack on our region, coming only days after enacting a tax bill that disproportionately hits homeowners in New Jersey. This one-two punch makes it glaringly apparent that this President has no interest in rebuilding America's infrastructure or putting Americans back to work.”

Rep. Payne, Jr., is a member of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.


See more headlines at The Ponder News Web Site

Norcross Statement on Iran Protests

By Donald Norcross (D-NJ, 1st)



Cherry Hill, NJ - January 6, 2017 - (The Ponder News) -- Congressman Donald Norcross (NJ-01), member of the House Armed Services Committee, issued the below statement on the recent escalation of anti-regime protests in Iran:

“Everyone should have the fundamental right to protest against a repressive regime and I stand with the people in Iran who are expressing this right and desire to shape a better future for themselves and their families. The protesters have legitimate concerns about human rights violations and corruption, and the Iranian government should both listen and address these serious matters.

“One key reason I opposed the JCPOA in 2015 was out of concern that once sanctions were lifted, billions of dollars would be used to buy more weapons and outsource more terror. Today, I strongly urge the regime to spend its money on the social welfare of the Iranian people, not weapons for terrorists and separatist fighters.

“As protestors peacefully gather and express themselves, I support their fight against economic hardship, inequality and oppression.”


See more headlines at The Ponder News Web Site

Friday, January 5, 2018

Mullin Statement on SAMHSA Rule Affecting Patients’ Records

By Markwayne Mullin (R-OK, 2nd)



Washington, D.C. - January 5, 2017 - (The Ponder News) -- Congressman Markwayne Mullin (OK-2) released the following statement after the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) finalized a rule allowing patients’ substance abuse records to be shared for billing and operational purposes:

“I’m encouraged by this final rule that improves billing and streamlines operations within the health care system,” Mullin said. “However, the real need is for doctors to have access to these records before treating their patients. We cannot expect doctors to safely treat a patient with only half of their medical history, yet under current law that is exactly what they are expected to do. I want to thank SAMHSA for their efforts to update this outdated law and I look forward to working with my colleagues in Congress to modernize this process and ensure doctors have the information they need to deliver the best care possible for their patients.”

Congressman Mullin is the lead sponsor of H.R. 3545, the Overdose Prevention and Patient Safety Act, which would give doctors access to patients’ substance abuse records for the sake of preventing tragic overdoses and improving patient safety.

On January 18, 2017, SAMHSA published a final rule (82 FR 6052) to provide greater flexibility in disclosing patient identifying information within the health care system while continuing to address the need to protect the confidentiality of substance use disorder patient records.


See more headlines at The Ponder News Web Site

MCCOLLUM, TOP DEMOCRATS ALARMED BY EPA CONTRACT WITH GOP OPERATIVES

By Betty McCollum (D-MN, 4th)



Washington, D.C. - January 5, 2017 - (The Ponder News) -- Congresswoman Betty McCollum (DFL-Minn.), Ranking Member of the House Interior-Environment Appropriations Subcommittee, and Democratic leaders of the Energy and Commerce and Transportation and Infrastructure committees sent a letter to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Scott Pruitt today expressing their serious concerns regarding a no-bid contract awarded by EPA to Definers Public Affairs.

The Democrats voiced concerns that the $120,000 contract – recently terminated by Definers after press reports brought the contract to light – was awarded without full and open competition to a company with no apparent experience in providing these services to a Federal agency. The Democratic leaders also wrote that they were “deeply troubled” by Definers staffers’ involvement in an apparent witch hunt against EPA employees who may have publicly or privately expressed concerns about the agency or its leadership.

In addition to McCollum, the letter was signed by Energy and Commerce Ranking Member Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ), Transportation and Infrastructure Ranking Member Peter DeFazio (D-OR), E&C Environment Subcommittee Ranking Member Paul Tonko (D-NY), and T&I Water Resources and Environment Subcommittee Ranking Member Grace Napolitano (D-CA).

“We have become increasingly concerned about the secrecy and lack of transparency from your administration, and this latest report is an alarming new development,” the Democratic Committee leaders wrote to Administrator Pruitt. “Hiring a firm that offers services attacking the press and surveilling your employees threatens the functioning of your agency and potentially the freedom of the press guaranteed by our Constitution.”

As part of their inquiry, the Democrats are requesting answers to a series of questions and additional information from Administrator Pruitt, including:

  • What was Pruitt’s role in selecting Definers for this award? In addition to Pruitt, which EPA political appointees were involved in selecting Definers?
  • Were Pruitt or other EPA political appointees aware of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests filed by Definers employees against individual agency employees before the contract was awarded?
  • Was Definers, America Rising, or any of their agents involved in creating or funding the website ConfirmPruitt.com?
  • Were Pruitt, his agents, or any current EPA employees involved in generating or reviewing the content of the website ConfirmPruitt.com, or providing or raising funds for the site?
  • What work did Definers perform for EPA pursuant to the contract? What was the total amount of taxpayer funds EPA paid Definers during the duration of the contract?
  • On December 10, The New York Times published an article identifying an alarming decrease in enforcement actions brought by the EPA under Pruitt’s leadership. EPA issued an unusual press release in response, which has since been removed from the agency website but continues to be cited by conservative media sources. What role did Definers play in the agency’s response to the December 10th article?
  • Provide any correspondence between EPA and any representative of Definers, America Rising, America Rising Squared, and the Need to Know Network regarding the December 10th article.
  • What firewalls were in place in the contract with Definers Corp to ensure that Definers firewalled the media monitoring services provided under the Contract from its services that would violate the Publicity or Propaganda Prohibition and Anti-Lobbying provisions?
  • Please provide a copy of the contract between EPA and Definers Corp. including any statement of work.


  • The letter to Administrator Pruitt is available HERE.

    See more headlines at The Ponder News Web Site